The circumstances under which the United States has taken individuals into custody both domestically and abroad have raised serious constitutional concerns. Immediately after 9/11, immigration authority was abused within the United States to deport individuals who had no connections to terrorism. In the “war on terror,” the term “enemy combatant” was transformed into an overbroad designation that justified prolonged detention without legal recourse.
 
The denial of due process was, unfortunately, an all too common occurrence. In particular, the flawed systems put in place at Guantánamo Bay Naval Base created a legal black hole. There was no meaningful judicial process to determine which detainees could legitimately be held. The Constitution Project’s Liberty and Security Committee has called for investigations into the alleged abuse of individuals at United States detention facilities in violation of both domestic and international law. We must enhance our security without sacrificing our civil liberties.
 
In addition to threatening individual rights, our detention policies have gravely impaired core constitutional doctrines. Detention policies in the aftermath of September 11 provided for unchecked authority for the executive branch without respect for the separation of powers doctrine. Congress and the courts largely were unable or unwilling to provide a meaningful check on the executive branch. In recent years, the Supreme Court has reasserted its role as an independent check by extending habeas rights to Guantanamo detainees. Congress, among other policies, has passed anti-terrorism legislation that is problematic from a First Amendment standpoint. The Constitution Project continues to monitor executive branch policy in an effort to assure that the proper balance of power between the branches is restored.
 

 

Recent News

9/1/2010

Criminal Justice Program Associate

7/29/2010

Amicus brief filed in case involving right to counsel for indigent defendants

7/29/2010

A Who’s Who of American lawyers, policymakers and scholars condemn attacks on lawyers representing terrorism suspects

7/28/2010

Congress Votes to Narrow Gap in Cocaine Sentencing Rules

7/6/2010

JURIST: Prosecute Defendants, Not Their Counsel